ENSURING JCPS DOESN'T INCREASE OUR TAXES . . . AGAIN

Recently we have all heard that some members of the JCPS School Board are talking about raising taxes to address their $188 million budget deficit. Let me be clear: that deficit exists because of overspending, not a lack of revenue. And the legislature has been working to protect you from more tax increases.

Here's what you need to know.

What JCPS Wanted to Do:

The School Board had their eye on new taxes, including adding a tax on your utility bills. I worked specifically to take that off the table, along with any other new taxes JCPS might have tried to levy. The legislature's actions this year made sure that option is no longer available to them.

Why These Protections Matter: A Recent Lesson

This isn't theoretical. In 2020, JCPS approved a 9.5 percent property tax increase and they have been talking about raising it again this year. Citizens who opposed that 9.5 percent increase collected over 40,000 signatures on a petition to force a ballot question so voters could decide the issue. But here's the problem: under the law at that time, they needed signatures equal to 10 percent of voters in the district. For Jefferson County, that meant roughly 35,500 signatures were required. The petition had enough valid signatures to qualify—but the court threw out the entire petition on a technicality involving how some signatures were collected electronically. The tax increase stood and we are paying that increase today. JCPS kept the money.

But our citizens were rightfully frustrated, so the legislature responded by making it dramatically easier for people to challenge large tax increases.

In particular, we reduced the signature requirement from 35,500 down to just 5,000 signatures. That is roughly 86 percent fewer people needed to demand a ballot vote. We also authorized electronic signatures, so you can sign a petition on your phone or computer instead of having to find paper copies. (Kevin D. Bratcher and Ken Fleming for Kentucky led that effort to protect our citizens.)

This wasn't about stopping necessary taxes. It was about making sure that when school boards want to take significantly more money from your paycheck and property, you have a real, practical way to demand a vote.

As I noted above, that high tax increase went into effect. Yet JCPS, in all their glorious incompetence, still got into a $188 million hole. So some of the JCPS Board members have been chirping about raising taxes again, both on your property and in finding new taxes, like taxing your utility bill. So this past session, in HB 757, we went further. The legislature specifically prohibited JCPS and other school boards from:

- Levying any new occupational or personal property taxes (the kinds of taxes on your vehicles, income, ,and utilities that JCPS was eyeing)

- Raising the rates of any occupational or personal property taxes that already exist

Why This Matters to You

You already pay more than enough taxes. Jefferson County residents support public services through state income tax, sales tax, property tax, and local taxes. When school boards face budget challenges, especially of their own making, the solution should not be unlimited new taxes. It should be managing the resources they have responsibly.

The legislature's job is to balance protecting essential services with protecting hardworking Kentuckians from endless tax increases. These protections do exactly that.

Note: I want to note that our new Superintendent has consistently said that he does not support raising taxes, as he thinks the school district needs to get its house in order before even thinking about coming to the voters for a tax increase. I agree with him and want to give him kudos for taking that position. I hope JCPS does get its financial house in order, so our new Superintendent can get to what he was hired to do, which is to improve academic achievement. The current budgetary deficit is the fault of previous school board members.

This information was compiled based on the taxes of a citizen who lives in Fisherville. The percentages may slightly change based on where you live, such as whether you live in a suburban city, an unincorporated area, or in Oldham or Shelby Counties.

Kentucky Medicaid Reform: Why House Bill 2 Was Necessary

The Kentucky General Assembly recently passed House Bill 2, a significant reform to Kentucky’s Medicaid program. Jason recently shared a chart that tells a big part of this story in a single glance — showing just how dramatically Kentucky’s Medicaid enrollment and costs have grown in recent years.

Kentucky’s Medicaid program has expanded significantly, and while Jason supports ensuring that the most vulnerable Kentuckians have access to healthcare, he also believes that programs must be sustainable and that benefits should go to those who truly qualify. House Bill 2 includes common-sense reforms to ensure the program’s long-term viability.

The reforms include work requirements for able-bodied adults, improved eligibility verification processes, and other measures designed to ensure Medicaid resources are focused on those with genuine needs. Jason believes these are responsible, compassionate reforms that will strengthen the program for the long term.

For more details on Jason’s position on Medicaid reform, visit the Medicaid Reform page under Issues on this website.

Property Tax Reform: Understanding Where Your Tax Dollars Go

There has been a lot of discussion about property tax reform in Kentucky. Jason recently shared an important breakdown of where property tax dollars actually go — and the answer might surprise you: it is almost all local.

Property taxes collected in Kentucky primarily go to local entities, not the state government. The largest recipient is JCPS (Jefferson County Public Schools) and the elected School Board, which controls the majority of local property tax funds. Other local entities like libraries, fire protection districts, and local governments also receive portions.

Understanding this breakdown is critical when having the property tax reform discussion. Any meaningful reform must address local government spending and the decisions made by locally elected boards. Jason is committed to ensuring that Kentuckians understand how their tax dollars are spent at every level of government.

Jason will continue to be a voice for transparency and accountability in how all levels of government collect and spend taxpayer money. Follow him on Facebook for regular updates on fiscal policy and tax issues affecting Kentucky families.